"This month I learned that innodb_dedicated_server is great. Don't need to set many options beyond it. I have been doing it wrong."and decided to check what this great setting (that I also never cared to use with MySQL 8) is really doing. I could, surely, just re-read the fine manual (and I did that), but what can be better than just trying it?
Yesterday I had some free time in the morning for testing random things and was sitting near my good old Fedora (yes, I know, time to use 32 if not 33...) test box, with 8G of RAM and 4 cores:
and it had MySQL 8.0.18 there (also time to rebuild from recent GitHub source, I know...). So, I tried to compare settings with --no-defaults:[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ pt-summary
# Percona Toolkit System Summary Report ######################
Date | 2020-06-20 05:27:35 UTC (local TZ: EEST +0300)
Hostname | fc29
Uptime | 39 min, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.37, 0.39
Platform | Linux
Release | Fedora release 29 (Twenty Nine)
Kernel | 5.3.11-100.fc29.x86_64
Architecture | CPU = 64-bit, OS = 64-bit
Threading | NPTL 2.28
Compiler | GNU CC version 8.3.1 20190223 (Red Hat 8.3.1-2).
SELinux | Enforcing
Virtualized | No virtualization detected
# Processor ##################################################
Processors | physical = 1, cores = 4, virtual = 4, hyperthreading = no
Speeds | 1x1999.777, 1x1999.816, 1x2001.216, 1x2030.647
Models | 4xIntel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz
Caches | 4x2048 KB
# Memory #####################################################
Total | 7.7G
Free | 247.4M
Used | physical = 2.1G, swap allocated = 0.0, swap used = 0.0, virtual = 2.1G
Shared | 198.6M
Buffers | 5.4G
Caches | 5.1G
Dirty | 352 kB
UsedRSS | 4.3G
Swappiness | 60
DirtyPolicy | 20, 10
DirtyStatus | 0, 0
...
Then I've added the magic option and repeated the same steps:[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ ./bin/mysqld_safe --no-defaults --basedir=/home/openxs/dbs/8.0 --datadir=/home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data &
[1] 3764
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ 2020-06-20T05:21:24.289203Z mysqld_safe Logging to '/home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data/fc29.err'.
2020-06-20T05:21:24.378630Z mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ ./bin/mysql -uroot -e'select version()';
+-----------+
| version() |
+-----------+
| 8.0.18 |
+-----------+
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ ./bin/mysql -uroot -e'show global variables' >/tmp/default.txt
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ ./bin/mysql -uroot -e'shutdown';
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ 2020-06-20T05:22:35.220091Z mysqld_safe mysqld from pid file /home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data/fc29.pid ended
[1]+ Done ./bin/mysqld_safe --no-defaults --basedir=/home/openxs/dbs/8.0 --datadir=/home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ cat /tmp/default.txt | grep innodb_dedicated
innodb_dedicated_server OFF
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ ./bin/mysqld_safe --no-defaults --basedir=/home/openxs/dbs/8.0 --datadir=/home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data --innodb_dedicated_server=ON &
[1] 3993
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ 2020-06-20T05:23:10.824899Z mysqld_safe Logging to '/home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data/fc29.err'.
2020-06-20T05:23:10.870749Z mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data
So, what was the real difference? Here it is, thanks diff:[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ tail -f data/fc29.err
2020-06-20T05:23:10.870749Z mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /home/openxs/dbs/8.0/data
2020-06-20T05:23:10.888077Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010139] [Server] Changed limits: max_open_files: 1024 (requested 8161)
2020-06-20T05:23:10.888097Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010142] [Server] Changed limits: table_open_cache: 431 (requested 4000)
2020-06-20T05:23:11.168384Z 0 [System] [MY-010116] [Server] /home/openxs/dbs/8.0/bin/mysqld (mysqld 8.0.18) starting as process 4117
100 200 300 400 500
100 200 300 400 500
100 200 300 400 500
100 200 300 400 500
100 200 300 400 500
100 200 300 400 500
2020-06-20T05:23:59.904782Z 0 [Warning] [MY-010068] [Server] CA certificate ca.pem is self signed.
2020-06-20T05:24:00.145885Z 0 [System] [MY-010931] [Server] /home/openxs/dbs/8.0/bin/mysqld: ready for connections. Version: '8.0.18' socket: '/tmp/mysql.sock' port: 3306 Source distribution.
2020-06-20T05:24:00.218482Z 0 [System] [MY-011323] [Server] X Plugin ready for connections. Socket: '/tmp/mysqlx.sock' bind-address: '::' port: 33060
^C
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ ./bin/mysql -uroot -e'show global variables' >/tmp/dedicated.txt
Actually, fine manual page that Mark Callaghan pointed to, explain most of these changes:[openxs@fc29 8.0]$ diff -u /tmp/default.txt /tmp/dedicated.txt
--- /tmp/default.txt 2020-06-20 08:22:25.674368791 +0300
+++ /tmp/dedicated.txt 2020-06-20 08:24:40.938561950 +0300
@@ -130,11 +130,11 @@
innodb_buffer_pool_dump_pct 25
innodb_buffer_pool_filename ib_buffer_pool
innodb_buffer_pool_in_core_file ON
-innodb_buffer_pool_instances 1
+innodb_buffer_pool_instances 8
innodb_buffer_pool_load_abort OFF
innodb_buffer_pool_load_at_startup ON
innodb_buffer_pool_load_now OFF
-innodb_buffer_pool_size 134217728
+innodb_buffer_pool_size 6442450944
innodb_change_buffer_max_size 25
innodb_change_buffering all
innodb_checksum_algorithm crc32
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
innodb_data_file_path ibdata1:12M:autoextend
innodb_data_home_dir
innodb_deadlock_detect ON
-innodb_dedicated_server OFF
+innodb_dedicated_server ON
innodb_default_row_format dynamic
innodb_directories
innodb_disable_sort_file_cache OFF
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
innodb_fill_factor 100
innodb_flush_log_at_timeout 1
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit 1
-innodb_flush_method fsync
+innodb_flush_method O_DIRECT_NO_FSYNC
innodb_flush_neighbors 0
innodb_flush_sync ON
innodb_flushing_avg_loops 30
@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@
innodb_log_buffer_size 16777216
innodb_log_checksums ON
innodb_log_compressed_pages ON
-innodb_log_file_size 50331648
-innodb_log_files_in_group 2
+innodb_log_file_size 536870912
+innodb_log_files_in_group 6
innodb_log_group_home_dir ./
innodb_log_spin_cpu_abs_lwm 80
innodb_log_spin_cpu_pct_hwm 50
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
innodb_online_alter_log_max_size 134217728
innodb_open_files 431
innodb_optimize_fulltext_only OFF
-innodb_page_cleaners 1
+innodb_page_cleaners 4
innodb_page_size 16384
innodb_parallel_read_threads 4
innodb_print_all_deadlocks OFF
[openxs@fc29 8.0]$
"WhenIt described the settings in details. For systems with >4G of RAM (like mine) 75% of RAM is allocated for innodb_buffer_poll_size. Then if innodb_buffer_pool_size <= 8G, innodb_log_file_size is set to 512M. Number of redo log files in group is explained properly:innodb_dedicated_server
is enabled,InnoDB
automatically configures the following variables:
Only consider enabling
innodb_buffer_pool_size
innodb_log_file_size
innodb_log_files_in_group
(as of MySQL 8.0.14)innodb_flush_method
innodb_dedicated_server
if the MySQL instance resides on a dedicated server where it can use all available system resources."
"The number of log files is configured according to the automatically configured buffer pool size (in gigabytes)."That's why we see 6G for innodb_buffer_pool_size (75% of almost 8G) and 6 for innodb_log_files_in_group. I am not sure if that many (or more than 3) log files make any practical sense or help with anything, but probably it's a way to make sure total capacity of redo log is "large enough", while each log is not larger than 2048M.
As for setting innodb_flush_method, the value of O_DIRECT_NO_FSYNC is questionable, because of a known bug, Bug #94912 - "O_DIRECT_NO_FSYNC possible write hole". The manual is clear about this case:
"Data loss is possible if redo log files and data files
reside on different storage devices, and a crash occurs
before data file writes are flushed from a device cache that
is not battery-backed. If you use or intend to use different
storage devices for redo log files and data files, and your
data files reside on a device with a cache that is not
battery-backed, use O_DIRECT
instead."
But I am not yet sure if the implementation is smart enough NOT to make this setting when redo logs are stored on different filesystem. Something to check later.You may ask why setting innodb_page_cleaners to 4 is NOT documented? Well, it is the default setting and the reason why it was adjusted to 1 in my initial configuration is explained in the manual here:
"If the number of page cleaner threads exceeds the number of buffer pool instances,I had one buffer pool instance by default, as default innodb_buffer_pool_size was < 1G. As a result of this magic tuning it's 6G, so 8 instances are used (and we can use 4 innodb_page_cleaners). Again, a questionable (but default) setting.innodb_page_cleaners
is automatically set to the same value asinnodb_buffer_pool_instances
. "
The default value of innodb_page_cleaners, 4, is not the best fit for all. As recent Percona blog stated:
"With 4 cleaner threads, InnoDB is able to flush at a very high rate. Actually, unless you are using Percona Server for MySQL with the parallel doublewrite buffers feature, very likely the doublewrite buffer will bottleneck before the cleaner threads."After reading the manual pages related to the feature, I found it well documented. The only formal problem was reported as Bug #99945 - "Missing details in the description of innodb_dedicated_server".
Sometimes we have to clarify the details of some MySQL features, to find out there is no real magic behind them. |
- I would not say that innodb_dedicated_server setting replaces setting of really many options. Just 4 by the manual and 6 in my corner case that compared to --no-defaults settings.
- Some settings are obvious and good (use 75% of RAM for InnoDB buffer pool if RAM is large enough, use reasonably large redo log space, others are somewhat questionable. The company I work for moves to the opposite direction with them for version 10.5.
- The feature is well documented.
- Personally I do not think that doing one setting instead of 4-6, for key InnoDB variables, is such a big deal for any use cases besides some artificial benchmarks.
Since you seem to care about Oracle's aggregator, I won't mention the company you work for and I will avoid complete URLs. But I would never do that on my site.
ReplyDeleteHowever, you mentioned that they are moving in the opposite direction. I want to point out that the reasoning behind their choice are public, and they're also useful readings. The ones I know about are:
* MDEV-15058 - Remove multiple InnoDB buffer pool instances: Here I can see interesting benchmarks.
* MDEV-14425 - Change the InnoDB redo log format to reduce write amplification: This change is well described, and it's why innodb_log_files_in_group is now ignored.
I would love to see similar discussion from MySQL team. They will hardly ever have a public JIRA equivalent, but they have good technical blogs that could be used to explain their views.
I actually asked LeFred to remove my feed from it, but wanted to check if that really happened. One of my ideas was to create followup post explaining what MariaDB does in 10.5, and maybe even why. Yes, these JIRA issues, and more...
DeleteActually, MDEV-14425 was not completed. But, the upcoming MariaDB Server 10.5 release will allow only a single redo log file. In our benchmarks, a single file performed slightly better than multiple files, and we prefer the code to be simpler.
DeleteMDEV-14425 would likely introduce a separate log file for information related to checkpoints and file operations. That file could also be used by incremental backup, to 'inject' data that is not part of the original log.
The comment above is mine, I am Federico Razzoli. I wrote a message to Valerii to confirm my identity. For some reason, my blog considers me anonymous even if I'm logged.
ReplyDelete>Personally I do not think that doing one setting instead
ReplyDelete> of 4-6, for key InnoDB variables, is such a big deal for
> any use cases besides some artificial benchmarks.
You and other support experts are not the target audience for this feature.
Hi Valerii, just to let you know that MySQL 8.0.20 uses 2 double-write buffers by default.
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Great, so probably doublewrite buffer is no longer a bottleneck :)
DeleteDedicated Server For CPA Firms in USA
ReplyDelete