As usual, I start with the oldest bugs and try to mention bug reporters by name with links to their other reports whenever this may give something useful to a reader. I try to check if MariaDB is also affected in some cases. Check also my summary comments at the end of this blog post.
- Bug #94148 - "Unnecessary Shared lock on parent table During UPDATE on a child table". In this bug report Uday Varagani reasonably pointed out that formally there is no need to lock parent row when column NOT included in the foreign key gets updated. This happens though when this column is included into the index used to support foreign key constraint. IMHO it's a reasonable feature request and both Trey Raymond and Sveta Smirnova tried their best to highlight this, but this report now has a "Need Feedback" status with a request to explain new algorithm suggested. It's simple - "Stop it", check that column changed is NOT the one foreign key is defined on, even if it's in the same index...I see no reason NOT to verify this as a reasonable feature request. Is it a new policy that every feature request should come with details on how to implement it? I truly doubt.
- Bug #94224 - "[5.6] Optimizer reconsiders index based on index definition order, not value". Domas Mituzas found yet another case (see also Bug #36817 - "Non optimal index choice, depending on index creation order" from Jocelyn Fournier, the bug I verified more than 10 years ago) when in MySQL order of index definition matters more for optimizer than anything else. My quick check shows that MariaDB 10.3.7 is not affected:
MariaDB [test]> explain select distinct b from t1 where c not in (0) and d > 0;+------+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+--------------------+---------+------+------+-------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len
Fortunately MySQL 8 is no longer affected. Unfortunately we do not see a public comment showing the results of testing on MySQL 5.7 (or any version, for that matter), from engineer who verified the bug. I already pointed out that this "metabug" becomes popular in my previous blog post.
| ref | rows | Extra |+------+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+--------------------+--------+------+------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | t1 | index | NULL | non_covering_index | 9 | NULL | 1 | Using where |
+------+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+--------------------+---------+------+------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.002 sec)
MariaDB [test]> alter table t1 add index covering_index (b, c, d);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.149 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
MariaDB [test]> explain select distinct b from t1 where c not in (0) and d > 0;
+------+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+----------------+---------+------+------+--------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len
| ref | rows | Extra |
+------+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+----------------+---------+------+------+--------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | t1 | index | NULL | covering_index | 14
| NULL | 1 | Using where; Using index |
+------+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+----------------+---------+------+------+--------------------------+
1 row in set (0.025 sec) - Bug #94243 - "WL#9508 introduced non-idiomatic potentially-broken C macros". Laurynas Biveinis from Percona found new code that in ideal world wound not pass any serious code review.
- Bug #94251 - "Aggregate function result is dependent by window is defined directly or as named". This bug was reported by Владислав Сокол. From what I see:
MariaDB [test]> WITH RECURSIVE cte AS (
MariaDB 10.3.7 is NOT affected.
-> SELECT 1 num
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT num+1 FROM cte WHERE num < 5
-> )
-> SELECT num, COUNT(*) OVER (frame) cnt_named, COUNT(*) OVER (ORDER BY num
DESC) cnt_direct
-> FROM cte
-> WINDOW frame AS (ORDER BY num DESC);
+------+-----------+------------+
| num | cnt_named | cnt_direct |
+------+-----------+------------+
| 1 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 |
+------+-----------+------------+
5 rows in set (0.117 sec)
MariaDB [test]> WITH RECURSIVE cte AS (
-> SELECT 1 num
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT num+1 FROM cte WHERE num < 5
-> )
-> SELECT num, COUNT(*) OVER (frame) cnt_named, COUNT(*) OVER (ORDER BY num
DESC) cnt_direct
-> FROM cte
-> WINDOW frame AS (ORDER BY num DESC)
-> ORDER BY num desc;
+------+-----------+------------+
| num | cnt_named | cnt_direct |
+------+-----------+------------+
| 5 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 1 | 5 | 5 |
+------+-----------+------------+
5 rows in set (0.003 sec) - Bug #94283 - "MySQL 8.0.15 is slower than MySQL 5.7.25". Percona's CTO Vadim Tkachenko reported that MySQL 8.0.15 is notably slower than 5.7.25 on a simple oltp_read_write sysbench test. He had recently written a separate blog post about this, with more details.There is one detail to clarify based on today's comment from Peter Zaitsev (was the same default character set used), but as my dear friend Sinisa Milivojevic verified the bug without any questions, requests or his own test outputs shared, we can assume that Oracle officially accepted this performance regression (even though "regression" tag was not set).
Check also later Bug #94387 - "MySQL 8.0.15 is slower than MySQL 5.7.25 in read only workloads", yet another performance regression report from Vadim, where he found that on read only (sysbench oltp_point_select) all in memory workloads MySQL 8.0.15 may also be slower than MySQL 5.7.25. - Bug #94302 - "reset master could not break dump thread in some cases". This bug was reported by Ashe Sun. This is definitely a corner case, as it happens only master is still writing to the very first binary log. We can not find out from public comments in the bug report if any other versions besides 5.7.x are affected. This is yet another "metabug" - during my days in Oracle's MySQL bugs verification team we had to check on all versions still supported and present the results explicitly.
- Bug #94319 - "Format_description_log_event::write can cause segfaults". Nice bug report by Manuel Ung from Facebook.
- Bug #94330 - "Test for possible compressed failures before upgrade?". Change of zlib version starting from MySQL 5.7.24 means that some operations for InnoDB tables with ROW_FORMAT=COMPRESSED that previously worked may start to fail. In this report Monty Solomon asks for some way to determine if there will be a problem with existing compressed tables before upgrading to 5.7.24. The bug is still "Open".
- Bug #94338 - "Dirty read-like behavior in READ COMMITTED transaction". Bug reporter, Masaki Oguro, stated that MySQL 8 is not affected (only 5.6 and 5.7) and the bug is verified on these versions, so we should assume it's really the case. But I miss public comment showing the result of testing on recent MySQL 8.0.15.
- Bug #94340 - "backwards incompatible changes in 8.0: Error number: 3747". Simon Mudd complains about incompatible change in 8.0.13 that does not allow slave to easily switch from SBR to RBR without restart (and was not clearly documented as a change in behavior). Make sure to read all comments.
- Bug #94370 - "Performance regression of btr_cur_prefetch_siblings". Nice bug report with a patch from Zhai Weixiang.
- Bug #94383 - "simple ALTER cause unnecessary InnoDB index rebuilds, 5.7.23 or later 5.7 rlses". In this bug report Mikhail Izioumtchenko presented the detailed analysis and suggested diagnostics patches to show what really happens and why. This bug is also a regression of a kind, so while testing results are presented, I still think that it could be processed better according to the good old rules I have in mind.
- Bug #94394 - "Absence of mysql.user leads to auto-apply of --skip-grant-tables". Great finding by Ceri Williams from Percona. Sveta Smirnova provided a separate MTR test case and clarified the impact of the bug. Surely this is also a regression comparing to MySQL 5.7, as there you can not start MySQL if mysql.user table is missing. I leave it to a reader to decide if there is any security-related impact of this bug...
- Bug #94396 - "Error message too broad: The used command is not allowed with this MySQL version". This bug was reported by my former colleague in Percona Support, famous Bill Karwin. Informative error messages matter for good user experience.
 |
| We rely on MySQL in a same way as that guys on top of dolphins pyramid on this strange monument in some court somewhere at the Lanes. Reliable foundation matters, so regressions should better be avoided. |
- Looks like it's time for Oracle to spend some efforts to make MySQL 8 great again, by fixing some of the bugs mentioned above, especially performance regressions vs MySQL 5.7 found recently by Vadim Tkachenko from Percona.
- Oracle continues to introduce backward-incompatible changes in behavior in minor MySQL 8.0.x releases at GA stage. This is not really good for any production environment.
- Asking bug reporters to provide "the basics of such a new algorithm" when they complain that current one is wrong or not optimal is a new word in bugs processing!
- When I joined MySQL bugs verification team in 2005 we've set up a culture of bugs processing that included, among other things, presenting in a public comment any successful or unsuccessful attempt to verify the bug, by copy-pasting all commands and statements used along with the outputs, whenever possible and with enough context to show what was really checked. I've studied this approach from Oracle's Tom Kyte over the previous 10 years when I followed him closely. I used to think it's standard for more than a decade already, a kind of my (and not only my) "heritage". It's sad to see this approach is no longer followed by many Oracle engineers who process bugs, in too many cases.
- Oracle engineers still do not use "regression" tag when setting "Verified" status for obviously regression bugs. I think bug reporters should care then to always set it when they report regression of any kind.
No comments:
Post a Comment